Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Two Turtledoves

Cat and Girl is an excellent comic, today's one in particular!



Click the banner to see the comic.

Saturday, December 23, 2006

Woah. Colour!


The Butterfly Ball, Roger Glover and Guest. Illustrated by Alan Aldrige.

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Bull vs Cow

I really enjoyed reading this paper, written in 1963 by a William G. Perry, Jr. I liked his argument, especially as I've been trying to figure out how best to translate to undergrad students, this apparently obvious yet often only vaguely grasped concept of "higher-order thinking" and how to play the game, as it were, in uni.

Excerpts:
To cow (v. intrans.) or the act of cowing:
To list data (or perform operations) without awareness of, or comment upon, the contexts, frames of reference, or points of observation which determine the origin, nature, and meaning of the data *(or procedures). To write on the assumption that "a fact is a fact." To present evidence of hard work as a substitute for understanding, without any intent to deceive.

To bull (v. intrans.) or the act of bulling:
To discourse upon the contexts, frames of reference and points of observation which would determine the origin, nature, and meaning of data if one had any. To present evidence of an understanding of form in the hope that the reader may be deceived into supposing a familiarity with content.

At the level of conscious intent, it is evident that cowing is more moral, or less immoral, than bulling. To speculate about unconscious intent would be either an injustice or a needless elaboration of my theme. It is enough that the impression left by cow is one of earnestness, diligence, and painful naivete. The grader may feel disappointment or even irritations but these feelings are usually balanced by pity, compassion, and a reluctance to hit a man when he's both down and moral. He may feel some challenge to his teaching, but none whatever to his one-ups-manship. He writes in the margin: "See me."

...

Of course it is Just possible that we carry with us, perhaps from our own school-days, an assumption that if a student is willing to work hard and collect "good hard facts" he can always be taught to understand their relevance, whereas a student who has caught on to the forms of relevance without working at all is a lost scholar.

But this is not in accord with our experience.

It is not in accord either, as far as I can see, with the stated values of a liberal education. If a liberal education should teach students "how to think," not only in their own fields but in fields outside their, own - that is, to understand "how the other fellow orders knowledge," then bulling, even in its purest form, expresses an important part of what a pluralist university holds dear, surely a more important part than the collecting of "facts that are facts" which schoolboys learn to do. Here then, good bull appears not as ignorance at all but as an aspect of knowledge. It is both relevant and "true." In a university setting good bull is therefore of more value than "facts," which, without a frame of reference, are not even "true" at all.

link

Monday, December 11, 2006

Life with ratties



Menu for Hope



Oh! Look at the prizes!

This is so odd-feeling.
I don't think I've ever given money to charity, desperately wanting to win something!

Tetsuya's! Becasse!

Some neat stuff

Lumen




Coffee & Cigarette Ring



Flying Bird Ring